The Koran promises perfect justice:
"On that day shall men come forward in throngs to behold their works,
and whosoever shall have wrought an atom’s weight of good shall behold
it, and whosoever shall have wrought an atom’s weight of evil shall behold
it." (Sura 99:6-8).
"On that day shall every soul be recompensed as it hath deserved:
no injustice on that day! Verily, God will be swift to reckon."
(Sura 40:17).
One should not wish such a thing on one's worst enemy. To the contrary, the 'people of the book' rejoice to know
that, "He has not dealt with us according to our sins, nor punished us according to our iniquities."
(Psalm 103:10)
and "It is of the LORD’S mercies that we are not consumed, because his compassions fail not."
(Lamentations 3:22).
Mohammed proclaims salvation for those whose good deeds outweigh
their bad deeds. But God is purely holy: "You are of purer eyes
than to behold evil, and cannot look on wickedness."
(Habakkuk 1:13).
How then can a holy God invite into His dwelling those who do evil, even
if their good deeds outnumber the bad? God does not grade on the curve:
"For whoever shall keep the whole law, and yet stumble in one point, he is guilty of all."
(James 2:10).
The Biblical perception that all men are sinners is not
universally shared. The French Revolution proclaimed, then itself
rebutted, the message that men are inherently good. This is also a
core component of Confucianism: "Confucius taught that human nature
is essentially good: as his follower Meng-tzu put it, 'Though water
naturally flows downward, it can be made to flow uphill but only as
a result of external force. Likewise man's nature is basically good,
but can be forced into bad ways through external pressure.'"
(Michael Green, But Don't All Religions Lead to God? p. 46).
Experience should be sufficient to show otherwise. In fact, many pagans are
aware there is a problem: "And the people of Priene dedicated a precinct to him
[Bias], which is called the Teutameum. His apophthegm is: Most men are bad."
(Diogenes Laertius, Lives of the Eminent
Philosophers, Book I, Chapter 5, Bias of Priene).
Dio Chrysostom is aware of the problem, pointing out that, even
with laws in force attaching penalties to theft, thievery is rampant:
"And here is an indication of the depravity of mankind. If men were to do away with the laws and licence were to be granted to strike one another, to commit murder, to steal the property of one's neighbours, to commit adultery, to be a footpad, then who must we suppose would be the persons who will refrain from these deeds and not, without the slightest scruple or hesitation, be willing to commit all manner of crimes? For even under present conditions we none the less are living unwittingly with thieves and kidnappers and adulterers and joining with them in the activities of citizenship, and in this respect we are no better than the wild beasts; for they too, if they take fright at men or dogs set to guard against them, refrain from thieving." (Dio Chrysostom, Discourse 69.9).
They tended to think, however, that mere education could solve
the problem. And the Bible does not teach that most men are bad, which
is certainly true, but all men.
Christians can rejoice that we have a Savior: "To Him who loved us
and washed us from our sins in His own blood, and has made us kings and
priests to His God and Father, to Him be glory and dominion forever and
ever. Amen." (Revelation 1:5). Atheists do not like this
confession, because it does not track with their sense of
self-worth:
"When you hear people in church debasing themselves and
saying that they are miserable sinners, and all the rest of it, it
seems contemptible and not worthy of self-respecting human beings."
(Bertrand Russell, Why I Am not a Christian, Kindle location 260).
But you are agreeing with God and God's word when you make this confession.
|