|
There is needless attention paid, on atheist web-sites, to the animal-count
here under consideration. There are two ways to interpret Zechariah 9:9:
first, that under the parallelism common in the Hebrew scriptures, the
male 'donkey' and 'the foal of a (female) donkey' are one and the same
animal, and second, that, under a literalist reading, there must be two
animals to correspond to the two descriptions: "Rejoice greatly, O
daughter of Sion; proclaim it aloud, O daughter of Jerusalem; behold, the
King is coming to thee, just, and a Saviour; he is meek and riding on an
ass, and a young foal." (Zechariah 9:9, Septuagint). Both interpretations
can be met by allowing two animals to join the parade; those observers
who find one superfluous may simply ignore its presence as irrelevant to
prophecy. Compare: "For the LORD will go before you, and the God of
Israel will be your rear guard." (Isaiah 52:12). Since Jehovah is
the God of Israel, does this simply mean that God, who is omnipresent,
circles both before and behind His servants? Or might a trinitarian see
two persons mentioned? An interpreter who understands, the one true and
living God, who is omnipresent, and who is triune, encamps about His people,
has met both readers' concerns.
Readers may object that these correspondences mean no more than that Jesus
consciously patterned Himself after the Messianic prophecies, and intentionally
did things the way the Messiah was supposed to do them. Certainly Jesus
did understand Himself to be the Messiah; but many of these prophecies
require, for their fulfillment, circumstances and actions by other people
that would not have been under a mortal man's control. Were Jesus no more
than a mortal man,-- an imposter,-- he could not have controlled what the
soldiers did, nor where his mother bore him..
|